Australasian Mining Review

Australasian Mining Review Spring 2011

Australasian Mining Review

Issue link: http://ebook.aprs.com.au/i/37922

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 120 of 335

115 Each of these threats are rated accordingly to levels i.e. 1, 2 or 3, with level 3 being the highest performance level. This means that the wearer is protected against brief contacts with a fl ame to the level indicated as well against convective heat, radiant heat, contact heat and small amounts of molten metal splash. AS/NZS 4824:2006 – Protective clothing for fi refi ghters - Requirements and test methods for protective clothing used for wildland fi refi ghting This standard sets out the performance requirements and test methods associated with protective clothing used for wildland fi refi ghting. It applies to the design of the garment, the minimum performance levels for the materials and the test methods to establish these performance levels. Wildland fi refi ghting involves exposure to summer temperatures for extended periods of time, therefore the assessment of the thermal properties of the protective clothing is critical. The testing involves fl ame spread (after 50 washes @ 60ºC), heat transfer (radiant), heat resistance tests as well as specifi c fabric comfort tests to ensure suitability for hot weather operations. Indura UltraSoft® is a market proven performance fabric. A trusted product which surpasses strict fl ame resistant testing and meets crucial electrical arc and fl ash fi re standards. Indura UltraSoft® meets many performance requirements including AS4824, AS2919, OSHA 1910.269, ASTM 1506, NFPA 70E, NFPA 2112, NFPA 1977, EN 470, EN 531 and CSGB 155.20. For ultimate peace of mind, specify the fabric fi rst – choose Indura UltraSoft® Nigel Parsons. F.R. & Tech. Support, Charles Parsons & Co. P/L., B.Sc.(Textile Tech.), Grad.Dip. Qual. Mgmt. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ issue 2.2

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of Australasian Mining Review - Australasian Mining Review Spring 2011